Kodu | Dersin Adı | Yarıyıl | Süresi(T+U) | Kredisi | AKTS Kredisi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
POL338 | FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
|
---|---|
Dersin Öğretim Dili : | İngilizce |
Dersin Düzeyi | LİSANS, TYY: + 6.Düzey, EQF-LLL: 6.Düzey, QF-EHEA: 1.Düzey |
Dersin Türü | Seçmeli |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli | - |
Dersin Koordinatörü | Dr.Öğr.Üyesi HABİBE GÜNGÖR |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi | |
Ders Ön Koşulu | Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
|
---|---|
Amaç: | This course consists of two parts. First part concentrates on the specific theories of FPA that on different levels of analysis intent to examine foreign policy decision making. Before we proceed with this group of theories, students are invited to revisit theories of International Relations that are the essential basis for understanding the foreign policy of a state. Second part of the course focuses on specific case studies. Here, students are taught FPA with the references to concrete events and decisions. This part of the course is an actual application of the first part. Also, in order to help students understand FPA, the second part of the course include assignments. These are presentation of case studies – analysis of the specific events and decisions. |
İçerik: | The aim of this seminar is to introduce students to the most important frameworks of analysis in the study of foreign policy. In other words, it is meant to show and refine the tools students can use and level they should consider to understand foreign affairs. |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
---|
By the end of this course, successful students will be able to: Understand, summarize and discuss the main approaches in foreign policy analysis. |
Evaluate these approaches with regards to the methodologies they employ and their usefulness for the analysis of particular problems of international politics |
Analyze a particular case from the perspective of one or more of these approaches |
Make a presentation of an analysis completed by the students: an examination of the concrete event by means of FPA theories |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Hafta | Ön Hazırlık | Konular | Yöntem |
1 | Smith et al., chapter 1. | 1. INTRODUCTION | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
2 | Smith et al., chapter 1. | 2. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS AS A DISCIPLINE | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
3 | Smith et al., chapters 2 - 5. | 3. THEORIES OF THE FPA | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
4 | Smith et al., chapter 6. | 4. ACTORS, STRUCTURES AND FPA. | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
5 | Smith et al., chapter 7. | 5. FOREIGN POLICY DECISION-MAKING: RATIONAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND NEUROLOGICAL MODELS | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
6 | Smith et al., chapter 8. | 6. IMPLEMENTATION AND BEHAVIOR. | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
7 | • Smith et al., chapter 10. • Wag the Dog film (1997) | 7. THE ROLE OF MEDIA AND PUBLIC OPINION. | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
8 | - | ARA SINAV | - |
9 | Smith et al., chapter 11. | 9. THE PRIMACY OF NATIONAL SECURITY. | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
10 | Smith et al., chapter 12. | 10. ECONOMIC STATECRAFT | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
11 | Smith et al., chapter 13. | 11. DUTIES BEYOND BORDERS. CASE OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
12 | • Smith et al., chapter 14. • Thirteen Days film (2000) | PART II. TEACHING FOREIGN POLICY CASES & STUDENTS’ PRESENTATIONS 12. THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
13 | Smith et al., chapter 16. | 13. NEOCONSERVATISM AND THE DOMESTIC SOURCES OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: THE ROLE OF IDEAS IN OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
14 | Smith et al., chapter 21. | 14. ISRAELI-EGYPTIAN (IN)SECURITY: THE YOM KIPPUR WAR | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
15 | Smith et al., chapters 1-21. | 15. GENERAL OVERVIEW | Lecture Q&A Discussion |
16 | - | FİNAL | - |
17 | - | FİNAL | - |
KAYNAKLAR |
---|
Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2016). Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Taylor & Francis. |
Auger, V. A. (1996). The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Analysis: The Carter Administration and the Neutron Bomb. Rowman & Littlefield. |
Breuning, M. (2007). Foreign policy analysis: a comparative introduction. Springer. |
Hudson, V. M. (2013). Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield. |
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., & Dunne, T. (Eds.). (2016). Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press. |
Smith, Steve, Tim Dunne, Amelia Hadfield. Dış Politika Teoriler Aktörler Örnek Olaylar. Sayfa Sayısı: 586. İlk Baskı Yılı: 2016. Dil: Türkçe |
Efegil, E. (2012). Dış politika analizi: Ders notları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. |
Çınar, Y. (2018) Örneklerde Dış Politika Analizi. Dora Yayıncılık |
Sönmezoğlu, F. (2005). Uluslararası politika ve dış politika analizi. Filiz Kitabevi. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi | Etkinlik Sayısı | Katkı Yüzdesi | Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz | (1) En Düşük | (2) Düşük | (3) Orta | (4) İyi | (5) Çok İyi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
KNOWLEDGE | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theoretical | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Explain the historical development process of Aviation Management.
|
||||||
2 |
Use computer programs related to Aviation Transportation.
|
||||||
3 |
Define basic concepts related with aviation management.
|
KNOWLEDGE | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factual | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Relate the information and facts in the field with other social sciences such as law, sociology, philosophy and history.
|
||||||
2 |
Classify the relationship between the basic functions of the business and the interactions between these functions.
|
||||||
3 |
Apply knowledge and skills related to his / her field by considering the legal aspect of occupational health and safety.
|
||||||
4 |
Explain the concepts of entrepreneurship and innovation with the field.
|
SKILLS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Manage operational activities related to the airline.
|
||||||
2 |
Gain lifelong learning skills and use knowledge of the field in the business life with the awareness of social responsibility.
|
SKILLS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practical | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Prepare written agreements with relevant institutions in accordance with the legislation.
|
||||||
2 |
Perform the theoretical and practical knowledge related to the field with appropriate analytical methods and modeling techniques in business life.
|
||||||
3 |
Manage all phases from planning to implementation of aviation operations as a member of a team.
|
||||||
4 |
Cooperate with stakeholders related to air transport.
|
||||||
5 |
Develop the modern techniques and tools necessary for applications related to the field.
|
OCCUPATIONAL | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomy & Responsibility | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Execute a study in his/her field independently.
|
||||||
2 |
Decide as an individual or a team member to solve the problems encountered in applications related to the field.
|
OCCUPATIONAL | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning to Learn | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Evaluate advanced knowledge and skills in his/her field with a critical approach.
|
||||||
2 |
Apply activities to improve his/her performance and his / her responsibility in line with the learning objectives by determining the learning needs.
|
OCCUPATIONAL | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Communication & Social | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Communicate with people and institutions related to the field in writing and verbally.
|
||||||
2 |
Explain his/her thoughts on the issues related to the field and suggestions for solutions to the problems by the related departments by using supporting quantitative and qualitative data.
|
||||||
3 |
Organize projects and activities for the social environment with social responsibility consciousness and to be able to apply those.
|
OCCUPATIONAL | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupational and/or Vocational | |||||||
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları | Katkı Düzeyi | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 |
Manage airports and terminal operations efficiently using aviation and business information.
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü | |||
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri | Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) | Süresi(saat sayısı) | Toplam İş Yükü |
Ders | 14 | 3 | 42 |
Derse Ön Hazırlık ve Ders Sonrası Pekiştirme | 14 | 4 | 56 |
Arazi Çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Grup Çalışması / Ödevi | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Laboratuvar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Okuma | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ödev | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Proje Hazırlama | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seminer | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Staj | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Teknik Gezi | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Web Tab. Öğrenme | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Yerinde Uygulama | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mesleki Faaliyet | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sosyal Faaliyet | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tez Hazırlama | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Alan Çalışması | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rapor Yazma | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final Sınavı | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Final Sınavı Hazırlığı | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Ara Sınav | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Ara Sınav Hazırlığı | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Kısa Sınav | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kısa Sınav Hazırlığı | 0 | 0 | 0 |
TOPLAM | 32 | 0 | 124 |
Genel Toplam | 124 | ||
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 | 4,9 | ||
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi | 5,0 |