Kodu |
Dersin Adı |
Yarıyıl |
Süresi(T+U) |
Kredisi |
AKTS Kredisi |
POL338 |
FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS |
5 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
Dersin Öğretim Dili : |
İngilizce |
Dersin Düzeyi |
LİSANS, TYY: + 6.Düzey, EQF-LLL: 6.Düzey, QF-EHEA: 1.Düzey |
Dersin Türü |
Seçmeli |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli |
- |
Dersin Koordinatörü |
Dr.Öğr.Üyesi ÇAĞLA TUĞBERK ARIKER |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi |
|
Ders Ön Koşulu |
Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
Amaç: |
This course consists of two parts. First part concentrates on the specific theories of FPA that on different levels of analysis intent to examine foreign policy decision making. Before we proceed with this group of theories, students are invited to revisit theories of International Relations that are the essential basis for understanding the foreign policy of a state. Second part of the course focuses on specific case studies. Here, students are taught FPA with the references to concrete events and decisions. This part of the course is an actual application of the first part. Also, in order to help students understand FPA, the second part of the course include assignments. These are presentation of case studies – analysis of the specific events and decisions. |
İçerik: |
The aim of this seminar is to introduce students to the most important frameworks of analysis in the study of foreign policy. In other words, it is meant to show and refine the tools students can use and level they should consider to understand foreign affairs. |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
By the end of this course, successful students will be able to:
Understand, summarize and discuss the main approaches in foreign policy analysis. |
Evaluate these approaches with regards to the methodologies they employ and their usefulness for the analysis of particular problems of international politics |
Analyze a particular case from the perspective of one or more of these approaches |
Make a presentation of an analysis completed by the students: an examination of the concrete event by means of FPA theories |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
Hafta |
Ön Hazırlık |
Konular |
Yöntem |
1 |
Smith et al., chapter 1. |
1. INTRODUCTION |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
2 |
Smith et al., chapter 1. |
2. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS AS A DISCIPLINE |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
3 |
Smith et al., chapters 2 - 5. |
3. THEORIES OF THE FPA |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
4 |
Smith et al., chapter 6. |
4. ACTORS, STRUCTURES AND FPA. |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
5 |
Smith et al., chapter 7. |
5. FOREIGN POLICY DECISION-MAKING: RATIONAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND NEUROLOGICAL MODELS |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
6 |
Smith et al., chapter 8. |
6. IMPLEMENTATION AND BEHAVIOR. |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
7 |
• Smith et al., chapter 10.
• Wag the Dog film (1997) |
7. THE ROLE OF MEDIA AND PUBLIC OPINION. |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
8 |
- |
ARA SINAV |
- |
9 |
Smith et al., chapter 11. |
9. THE PRIMACY OF NATIONAL SECURITY. |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
10 |
Smith et al., chapter 12. |
10. ECONOMIC STATECRAFT |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
11 |
Smith et al., chapter 13. |
11. DUTIES BEYOND BORDERS. CASE OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
12 |
• Smith et al., chapter 14.
• Thirteen Days film (2000) |
PART II. TEACHING FOREIGN POLICY CASES & STUDENTS’ PRESENTATIONS
12. THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
13 |
Smith et al., chapter 16. |
13. NEOCONSERVATISM AND THE DOMESTIC SOURCES OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: THE ROLE OF IDEAS IN OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
14 |
Smith et al., chapter 21. |
14. ISRAELI-EGYPTIAN (IN)SECURITY: THE YOM KIPPUR WAR |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
15 |
Smith et al., chapters 1-21. |
15. GENERAL OVERVIEW |
Lecture
Q&A
Discussion |
16 |
- |
FİNAL |
- |
17 |
- |
FİNAL |
- |
KAYNAKLAR |
Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2016). Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. Taylor & Francis. |
Auger, V. A. (1996). The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Analysis: The Carter Administration and the Neutron Bomb. Rowman & Littlefield. |
Breuning, M. (2007). Foreign policy analysis: a comparative introduction. Springer. |
Hudson, V. M. (2013). Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Rowman & Littlefield. |
Smith, S., Hadfield, A., & Dunne, T. (Eds.). (2016). Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. Oxford University Press. |
Smith, Steve, Tim Dunne, Amelia Hadfield. Dış Politika Teoriler Aktörler Örnek Olaylar. Sayfa Sayısı: 586. İlk Baskı Yılı: 2016. Dil: Türkçe |
Efegil, E. (2012). Dış politika analizi: Ders notları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. |
Çınar, Y. (2018) Örneklerde Dış Politika Analizi. Dora Yayıncılık |
Sönmezoğlu, F. (2005). Uluslararası politika ve dış politika analizi. Filiz Kitabevi. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi |
Etkinlik Sayısı |
Katkı Yüzdesi |
Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz |
(1) En Düşük |
(2) Düşük |
(3) Orta |
(4) İyi |
(5) Çok İyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
DERSİN PROGRAM ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARINA KATKISI
KNOWLEDGE |
Theoretical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Define the theories, concepts and principles of the basic and sub-fields of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Explain business functions and processes based on current scientific sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE |
Factual |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Relate internationally valid business cases with the theories and concepts of other social sciences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Cognitive |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Explain the current events and facts in his / her field analytically and systematically based on advanced knowledge and skills he / she has.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Practical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Use the theoretical and factual knowledge in business for occupational practices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Solve individual and organizational problems in business life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Use computer programs (SPSS, R, Excel, Stata) efficiently against the complex business problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Plan research and work using knowledge and skills gained in the field of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Organize the activities for organizational goals and purposes independently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Learning to Learn |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Criticize advanced knowledge and skills in the field with a critical approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Develop the existing knowledge and skills with a critical point of view under the impact of scientific, technological and current developments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Communication & Social |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Express his/her knowledge, thoughts and solutions on business to related stakeholders in written and verbal ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Use the information and communication technology software and equipment required for business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Apply the social, scientific, cultural and ethical values at the stages of collection of data, their implementation, interpretation and announcement of results in the field of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relate the concepts of social rights, occupational safety, employee health, quality management and sustainability with the cases in business life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri |
Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) |
Süresi(saat sayısı) |
Toplam İş Yükü |
Ders |
14 |
3 |
42 |
Derse Ön Hazırlık ve Ders Sonrası Pekiştirme |
14 |
4 |
56 |
Arazi Çalışması |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Grup Çalışması / Ödevi |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Laboratuvar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Okuma |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Ödev |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Proje Hazırlama |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Staj |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Teknik Gezi |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Web Tab. Öğrenme |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Uygulama |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Yerinde Uygulama |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mesleki Faaliyet |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sosyal Faaliyet |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Tez Hazırlama |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Alan Çalışması |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rapor Yazma |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Sınavı |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Final Sınavı Hazırlığı |
1 |
12 |
12 |
Ara Sınav |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Ara Sınav Hazırlığı |
1 |
12 |
12 |
Kısa Sınav |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Kısa Sınav Hazırlığı |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOPLAM |
32 |
0 |
124 |
|
Genel Toplam |
124 |
|
|
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 |
4,9 |
|
|
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi |
5,0 |
|