Kodu |
Dersin Adı |
Yarıyıl |
Süresi(T+U) |
Kredisi |
AKTS Kredisi |
SOC118 |
INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
Dersin Öğretim Dili : |
İngilizce |
Dersin Düzeyi |
BACHELOR'S DEGREE, TYY: + 6.Level, EQF-LLL: 6.Level, QF-EHEA: First Cycle |
Dersin Türü |
Zorunlu |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli |
- |
Dersin Koordinatörü |
Assist.Prof. GÖRSEV BAFRALI |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi |
|
Ders Ön Koşulu |
Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
Amaç: |
At the end of this course, students will be able to recognize the most important arguments of religion, metaphysics, epistemology and morality and analyze, evaluate and criticize these arguments with logical reasoning. |
İçerik: |
Contents of the course include the examination of most effective arguments on the philosophy of religion in Western philosophy (St. Aquinas, Pascal, Plato and Nietzsche); metaphysics (Parmenides, Plato, Berkeley, Epicurus, Sartre); epistemology (Descartes, Gettier, Hume) and moral philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Kant and Mill). |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
Recognize the most important arguments of Western philosophy about religion, metaphysics, epistemology and moral philosophy. |
Question whether these arguments can be derived from the results and precessors or not. |
Differentiate valid, coherent and robust reasoning from invalid, inconsistent and inaccurate reasoning. |
Interpret the most important arguments of western philosophy. |
Interpret moral dilemmas based on philosophical thought experiments and hypothesis. |
Discuss with each other in order to better predict and avoid counter-arguments. |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
Hafta |
Ön Hazırlık |
Konular |
Yöntem |
1 |
Reading |
Discussion on the nature of philosophical arguments |
Lecture, discussion |
2 |
Reading |
Philosophy of Religion: Five Evidences of St. Aquinas |
Lecture, discussion |
3 |
Reading |
Argument of Word, Onthological argument |
Lecture, discussion |
4 |
Reading |
Pascal's gambling, James' desire to believe |
Lecture, discussion |
5 |
Reading |
Problem of evil, Defense of free will |
Lecture, discussion |
6 |
Reading |
Euthyphron dilemma, Nietzsche’s argument of "God is Dead" |
Lecture, discussion |
7 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture, discussion |
8 |
- |
MID-TERM EXAM |
- |
9 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture, discussion |
10 |
Reading |
Berkeley's idealism, Epicurus' argument on death, Sartre's argument on freedom |
Lecture, discussion |
11 |
Reading |
Epistemology: Descartes's Cogito argument, Gettier problem, Hume's problem of reasoning |
Lecture, discussion |
12 |
Reading |
Philosophy of ethics: Platon's State, Aristoteles' argument on function |
Lecture, discussion |
13 |
Reading |
Kant's categorical command |
Lecture, discussion |
14 |
Reading |
Kant's categorical command |
Lecture, discussion |
15 |
Reading |
Mill and utilitarianism |
Lecture, discussion |
16 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
17 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
KAYNAKLAR |
Bruce, M. & Barbone, S. (2017). Batı Felsefesindeki 100 Temel Mesele. Çeviri: Mustafa Topal, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. |
Platon (2018). Devlet. Çeviri: M. Ali Cimcoz, Sabahattin Eyüboğlu. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. |
Nietzsche, F. (2010). Ahlakın Soy Kütüğü Üzerine. Çeviri: Turan Erdem. İstanbul: Arya Yayıncılık. |
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Essex: Pearson. |
Dennet, D. (2013). Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: Norton. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi |
Etkinlik Sayısı |
Katkı Yüzdesi |
Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz |
(1) En Düşük |
(2) Düşük |
(3) Orta |
(4) İyi |
(5) Çok İyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
DERSİN PROGRAM ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARINA KATKISI
KNOWLEDGE |
Theoretical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Defines current information in the field by associating it with grammatical and semantic structures of source and target languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE |
Factual |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Organizes teamwork in the stages of collecting, interpreting, announcing and applying data related to the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Cognitive |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Apply the advanced conceptual, theoretical and applied knowledge gained in the field of English Translation and Interpreting in the professional field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Interprets grammatical and semantic structures of source, target languages and a third language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Practical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Analyzes written and oral texts in the source language with cultural and historical approaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Evaluates relevant resources to improve the quality of text analysis at all stages of the translation process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Independently concludes advanced text analyzes and translations related to the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Expresses ideas orally and in writing in interdisciplinary studies with different fields of expertise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Learning to Learn |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Gains basic knowledge about all stages of the translation process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Uses lifelong learning principles in professional development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Communication & Social |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Discusses thoughts on written and oral translations of source and target languages with experts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Participates in trainings related to field at international level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Uses the knowledge and skills gained during his undergraduate education in business life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Solves various translation problems encountered in the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Applies knowledge of terminology, principles and legislation related to the field with the awareness of its legal and ethical responsibilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Places the awareness of the translator's social role and professional ethics in the team members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri |
Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) |
Süresi(saat sayısı) |
Toplam İş Yükü |
Lecture & In-Class Activities |
14 |
3 |
42 |
Preliminary & Further Study |
13 |
1 |
13 |
Land Surveying |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Group Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Laboratory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reading |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Assignment (Homework) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Project Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Internship |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Technical Visit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Web Based Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Implementation/Application/Practice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Practice at a workplace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Occupational Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Social Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Thesis Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Field Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Report Writing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Final Exam |
7 |
4 |
28 |
Mid-Term Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
41 |
0 |
100 |
|
Genel Toplam |
100 |
|
|
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 |
3,9 |
|
|
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi |
4,0 |
|