Kodu |
Dersin Adı |
Yarıyıl |
Süresi(T+U) |
Kredisi |
AKTS Kredisi |
SOS118 |
FELSEFEYE GİRİŞ |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
Dersin Öğretim Dili : |
Türkçe |
Dersin Düzeyi |
BACHELOR'S DEGREE, TYY: + 6.Level, EQF-LLL: 6.Level, QF-EHEA: First Cycle |
Dersin Türü |
Zorunlu |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli |
- |
Dersin Koordinatörü |
Assist.Prof. KADİR MERSİN |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi |
|
Ders Ön Koşulu |
Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
Amaç: |
The aim of this course is to enable students to; They recognize the most important arguments of western philosophy about religion, metaphysics, epistemology and morality and enable them to analyze, evaluate and criticize these arguments with logical reasoning. |
İçerik: |
The content of the course; constitutes a selection from the main currents of philosophy, selected names in the history of philosophy and their main contributions to the history of thought. |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
Recognize the most important arguments of Western philosophy about religion, metaphysics, epistemology and moral philosophy |
Question whether these arguments can be derived from the results and precessors or not. |
Differentiate valid, coherent and robust reasoning from invalid, inconsistent and inaccurate reasoning. |
Interpret the most important arguments of western philosophy. |
Discuss with each other in order to better predict and avoid counter-arguments. |
Interpret moral dilemmas based on philosophical thought experiments and hypothesis. |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
Hafta |
Ön Hazırlık |
Konular |
Yöntem |
1 |
Reading |
Discussion on the nature of philosophical arguments |
Lecture-Discussion |
2 |
Reading |
Philosophy of Religion: Five Evidences of St. Aquinas |
Lecture-Discussion |
3 |
Reading |
Argument of Word, Onthological argument |
Lecture-Discussion |
4 |
Reading |
Pascal's gambling, James' desire to believe |
Lecture-Discussion |
5 |
Reading |
Problem of evil, Defense of free will |
Lecture-Discussion |
6 |
Reading |
Euthyphron dilemma, Nietzsche’s argument of "God is Dead" |
Lecture-Discussion |
7 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture-Discussion |
8 |
- |
MID-TERM EXAM |
- |
9 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture-Discussion |
10 |
Reading |
Berkeley's idealism, Epicurus' argument on death, Sartre's argument on freedom |
Lecture-Discussion |
11 |
Reading |
Epistemology: Descartes's Cogito argument, Gettier problem, Hume's problem of reasoning |
Lecture-Discussion |
12 |
Reading |
Philosophy of ethics: Platon's State, Aristoteles' argument on function |
Lecture-Discussion |
13 |
Reading |
Philosophy of ethics: Platon's State, Aristoteles' argument on function |
Lecture-Discussion |
14 |
Reading |
Kant's categorical command |
Lecture-Discussion |
15 |
Reading |
Mill and utilitarianism |
Lecture-Discussion |
16 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
17 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
KAYNAKLAR |
Bruce,M., Barbone,S.(2017). Batı Felsefesindeki 100 Temel Mesele, (M. Topal, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. |
Platon. (2018). Devlet, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul. |
Nietzsche, F. (2010). Ahlakın Soy Kütüğü Üzerine, (T. Erdem, Çev.). Arya Yayıncılık, İstanbul. |
Paul, R. ,Elder, L.(2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life, Pearson: Essex, UK. |
Dennet,D. (2013). Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, Norton: New York. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi |
Etkinlik Sayısı |
Katkı Yüzdesi |
Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz |
(1) En Düşük |
(2) Düşük |
(3) Orta |
(4) İyi |
(5) Çok İyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
DERSİN PROGRAM ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARINA KATKISI
KNOWLEDGE |
Theoretical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To explain the basic concepts and theories associated with the field of Logistics Management.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE |
Factual |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To relate concepts and cases in the field of Logistics Management with other fields in Social Sciences
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
To make scientific and interdisciplinary research about the cases in the field.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Cognitive |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To draw conceptual and theoretical connections between past and present trade and logistics – transportation procedures and to make forecasts for the future
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Practical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To make literature review for analyzing cases in the field of Logistics Management and to use this information for personal studies
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
To use the latest technology for making descriptive and exploratory research and to use this information for personal studies.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To conduct a field-specific study individually and to complete it with discipline and responsibility.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
To assume duties and responsibilities in a team work as leader or team member and to fulfil them flawlessly.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Learning to Learn |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To analyze data and findings in the field of Logistics Management with respect to cause-effect relations and critical perspective.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
To identify gaps in the theory and practice of Logistics Management and to offer solutions for each.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
To develop ideas as to how to use the information related to the field of Logistics Management in professional life.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Communication & Social |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To convey information related with the field of Logistics Management by using effective presentation and communication techniques.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
To use field-specific information for creation of various projects, activities and social responsibility programmes in the field of Logistics Management
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
To conduct literature review, follow the recent developments and produce written and oral works in a foreign language
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
To respect social, cultural, scientific and ethical norms and values in the processing and dissemination of data.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
To follow latest developments in the field and direct personal studies accordingly within the framework of the lifelong learning principle.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri |
Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) |
Süresi(saat sayısı) |
Toplam İş Yükü |
Lecture & In-Class Activities |
14 |
3 |
42 |
Preliminary & Further Study |
13 |
1 |
13 |
Land Surveying |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Group Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Laboratory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reading |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Assignment (Homework) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Project Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Internship |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Technical Visit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Web Based Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Implementation/Application/Practice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Practice at a workplace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Occupational Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Social Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Thesis Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Field Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Report Writing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Final Exam |
6 |
5 |
30 |
Mid-Term Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
40 |
0 |
102 |
|
Genel Toplam |
102 |
|
|
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 |
4 |
|
|
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi |
4,0 |
|