Kodu |
Dersin Adı |
Yarıyıl |
Süresi(T+U) |
Kredisi |
AKTS Kredisi |
SOS118 |
FELSEFEYE GİRİŞ |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
Dersin Öğretim Dili : |
Türkçe |
Dersin Düzeyi |
BACHELOR'S DEGREE, TYY: + 6.Level, EQF-LLL: 6.Level, QF-EHEA: First Cycle |
Dersin Türü |
Zorunlu |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli |
- |
Dersin Koordinatörü |
Assist.Prof. AYŞE AYDIN |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi |
|
Ders Ön Koşulu |
Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
Amaç: |
The aim of this course is to enable students to; They recognize the most important arguments of western philosophy about religion, metaphysics, epistemology and morality and enable them to analyze, evaluate and criticize these arguments with logical reasoning. |
İçerik: |
The content of the course; constitutes a selection from the main currents of philosophy, selected names in the history of philosophy and their main contributions to the history of thought. |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
Recognize the most important arguments of Western philosophy about religion, metaphysics, epistemology and moral philosophy |
Question whether these arguments can be derived from the results and precessors or not. |
Differentiate valid, coherent and robust reasoning from invalid, inconsistent and inaccurate reasoning. |
Interpret the most important arguments of western philosophy. |
Discuss with each other in order to better predict and avoid counter-arguments. |
Interpret moral dilemmas based on philosophical thought experiments and hypothesis. |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
Hafta |
Ön Hazırlık |
Konular |
Yöntem |
1 |
Reading |
Discussion on the nature of philosophical arguments |
Lecture-Discussion |
2 |
Reading |
Philosophy of Religion: Five Evidences of St. Aquinas |
Lecture-Discussion |
3 |
Reading |
Argument of Word, Onthological argument |
Lecture-Discussion |
4 |
Reading |
Pascal's gambling, James' desire to believe |
Lecture-Discussion |
5 |
Reading |
Problem of evil, Defense of free will |
Lecture-Discussion |
6 |
Reading |
Euthyphron dilemma, Nietzsche’s argument of "God is Dead" |
Lecture-Discussion |
7 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture-Discussion |
8 |
- |
MID-TERM EXAM |
- |
9 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture-Discussion |
10 |
Reading |
Berkeley's idealism, Epicurus' argument on death, Sartre's argument on freedom |
Lecture-Discussion |
11 |
Reading |
Epistemology: Descartes's Cogito argument, Gettier problem, Hume's problem of reasoning |
Lecture-Discussion |
12 |
Reading |
Philosophy of ethics: Platon's State, Aristoteles' argument on function |
Lecture-Discussion |
13 |
Reading |
Philosophy of ethics: Platon's State, Aristoteles' argument on function |
Lecture-Discussion |
14 |
Reading |
Kant's categorical command |
Lecture-Discussion |
15 |
Reading |
Mill and utilitarianism |
Lecture-Discussion |
16 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
17 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
KAYNAKLAR |
Bruce,M., Barbone,S.(2017). Batı Felsefesindeki 100 Temel Mesele, (M. Topal, Çev.). İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul. |
Platon. (2018). Devlet, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul. |
Nietzsche, F. (2010). Ahlakın Soy Kütüğü Üzerine, (T. Erdem, Çev.). Arya Yayıncılık, İstanbul. |
Paul, R. ,Elder, L.(2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life, Pearson: Essex, UK. |
Dennet,D. (2013). Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, Norton: New York. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi |
Etkinlik Sayısı |
Katkı Yüzdesi |
Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz |
(1) En Düşük |
(2) Düşük |
(3) Orta |
(4) İyi |
(5) Çok İyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
DERSİN PROGRAM ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARINA KATKISI
KNOWLEDGE |
Theoretical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students define the concepts they learned and match them with their corresponding phenomena in the social world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
2 |
Students interpret concepts and theories taking into account their historical-cultural contexts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
3 |
Students compare sociological theories with reference to social problems.
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
Students distinguish the significance of ecological, social and economical sustainability for world’s future.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Students develop their knowledge on sustainability by the use of information and communication technologies.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE |
Factual |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students evaluate qualitative and quantitative data of sociological research studies.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Students analyse the complicated interactions between the social, cultural, political, economical and demographical phenomena of the global world.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Cognitive |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students design a research by their acquired knowledge and experience.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Practical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students research field study considering the principle of cultural relativity, scientific and ethical values.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Students efficiently apply the most suitable information and communication technologies in their studies.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Students use their knowledge on ecological, social and economical sustainability in all aspects of their lives.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students research on problems which reflect on their fields in the global world undergoing rapid and profound change.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Learning to Learn |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students criticize their advanced knowledge and skills in an analytical manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
2 |
Students develop their knowledge and skills within the frame of scientific, technological and current developments via adopting the principle of lifelong learning.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Students act ethically impartial in their research studies.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Communication & Social |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students criticize their advanced knowledge and skills in an analytical manner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
OCCUPATIONAL |
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Students apply the principle of cultural relativity, scientific and ethical values with reference to sustainability throughout their studies in their careers.
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri |
Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) |
Süresi(saat sayısı) |
Toplam İş Yükü |
Lecture & In-Class Activities |
14 |
3 |
42 |
Preliminary & Further Study |
13 |
1 |
13 |
Land Surveying |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Group Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Laboratory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reading |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Assignment (Homework) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Project Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Internship |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Technical Visit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Web Based Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Implementation/Application/Practice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Practice at a workplace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Occupational Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Social Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Thesis Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Field Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Report Writing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Final Exam |
6 |
5 |
30 |
Mid-Term Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
40 |
0 |
102 |
|
Genel Toplam |
102 |
|
|
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 |
4 |
|
|
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi |
4,0 |
|