Kodu |
Dersin Adı |
Yarıyıl |
Süresi(T+U) |
Kredisi |
AKTS Kredisi |
MIM228 |
KENTSEL TASARIM İLKELERİ |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
Dersin Öğretim Dili : |
Türkçe |
Dersin Düzeyi |
BACHELOR'S DEGREE, TYY: + 6.Level, EQF-LLL: 6.Level, QF-EHEA: First Cycle |
Dersin Türü |
Zorunlu |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli |
- |
Dersin Koordinatörü |
Assoc.Prof. İLKE CİRİTCİ |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi |
|
Ders Ön Koşulu |
Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
Amaç: |
The aim of the course is to introduce students to the basic theories and approaches related to urban design and to introduce contemporary design models. |
İçerik: |
This course includes basic theories and approaches related to urban design. The course has a content in which environmentally sustainable, economically feasible, safe and flexible design models are introduced, the importance of basic quality indicators such as connectivity and walkability in urban space is emphasized, and contemporary urban design approaches are conveyed. |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
Gains the ability to discuss the quality of urban design |
Evaluates the relationship between the concept of urban design and the physical, social and economic environment |
Gains the ability to evaluate the role of the designer on the quality components of architecture and urban space. |
Evaluates urban design theories and its situation in different periods together with the conditions of that period. |
Compares the importance given to the concept of urban design with current conditions. |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
Hafta |
Ön Hazırlık |
Konular |
Yöntem |
1 |
- |
Introduction, the concept of urban design |
Presentation, Q&A |
2 |
- |
The relationship between urban design, urban quality and quality of life |
Presentation, Q&A |
3 |
- |
Urban design utopias |
Presentation, Q&A |
4 |
- |
Design-oriented urban movements |
Presentation, Q&A |
5 |
- |
Components of urban space: Streets |
Presentation, Q&A |
6 |
- |
Components of urban space: Buildings |
Presentation, Q&A |
7 |
- |
Components of urban space: Squares |
Presentation, Q&A |
8 |
- |
MID-TERM EXAM |
- |
9 |
- |
The image of the city: Image Maps |
Presentation, Q&A |
10 |
- |
The image of the city: Intelligibility |
Presentation, Q&A |
11 |
- |
Quality of urban space: walkability |
Presentation, Q&A |
12 |
- |
Quality of urban space: visual quality |
Presentation, Q&A |
13 |
- |
Quality of urban space: safety and comfort |
Presentation, Q&A |
14 |
- |
Student presentations |
Student presentations |
15 |
- |
Student presentations |
Student presentations |
16 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
17 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
KAYNAKLAR |
Lynch, Kevin. The Image of the City. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1960. |
Carmona, Matthew. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press, 2003. |
Bacon, Edmund N. Design of Cities. New York: Viking Press, 1974. |
Cullen, Gordon. The Concise Townscape. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1971. |
Kopec, David Alan. Environmental Psychology for Design. New York: Fairchild, 2006. |
Larice, Michael, and Elizabeth Macdonald. The Urban Design Reader. 2013. |
Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. 1961. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi |
Etkinlik Sayısı |
Katkı Yüzdesi |
Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz |
(1) En Düşük |
(2) Düşük |
(3) Orta |
(4) İyi |
(5) Çok İyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
DERSİN PROGRAM ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARINA KATKISI
KNOWLEDGE |
Theoretical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
The students is able to implement the knowledge gained during the course to their working areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE |
Factual |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
They are able to assess and interpreter the environmental data for designing building by using advance skills and knowledge gained during the architectural education.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Cognitive |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
The students are able to have detail information regarding real life, experience and systems by focusing on the discipline of architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKILLS |
Practical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
They have the knowledge and concepts on the history of art, aesthetic, the skill of CAD use and cultural infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
They are able to have planning and management skills under a group responsibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
The students are able to gain the life-time learning skill that is the crucial part of the discipline of architecture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
They are able to know how to deal with their learning needs in the educational life and after.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Learning to Learn |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
They consider the ethical issues strictly in case of collecting data, interpretation of the data, producing the projects and the phase of implementation in the field of architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
They have sufficient awareness regarding environmental protection and occupational health and safety issues and also they consider risk management and responsibility issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Communication & Social |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
They are able to transfer or share their comments and/or critiques regarding the architectural projects and problems with certain methods such as written, oral or other presentation techniques. They are also able to inform individuals or institutions in the field of architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
They are able to share their thoughts and suggestions by supporting them with numerical and qualitative manner in the architectural field with the specialists or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
They are able to produce social responsibility projects and activities regarding social environment and they are also able to take active roles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
They are able to use of communication and information technologies effectively and efficiently in the field of architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
They are able to work independently in the field of architecture and its production areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
They are able to take responsibilities in the field of architectural productions in order to solve unpredictable problems and issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri |
Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) |
Süresi(saat sayısı) |
Toplam İş Yükü |
Lecture & In-Class Activities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preliminary & Further Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Land Surveying |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Group Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Laboratory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reading |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Assignment (Homework) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Project Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Internship |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Technical Visit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Web Based Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Implementation/Application/Practice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Practice at a workplace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Occupational Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Social Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Thesis Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Field Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Report Writing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Final Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mid-Term Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Genel Toplam |
0 |
|
|
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 |
0 |
|
|
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi |
0,0 |
|