Kodu |
Dersin Adı |
Yarıyıl |
Süresi(T+U) |
Kredisi |
AKTS Kredisi |
SOC118 |
INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
DERS BİLGİLERİ |
Dersin Öğretim Dili : |
İngilizce |
Dersin Düzeyi |
BACHELOR'S DEGREE, TYY: + 6.Level, EQF-LLL: 6.Level, QF-EHEA: First Cycle |
Dersin Türü |
Zorunlu |
Dersin Veriliş Şekli |
- |
Dersin Koordinatörü |
Assist.Prof. ÇAĞLA TUĞBERK ARIKER |
Dersi Veren Öğretim Üyesi/Öğretim Görevlisi |
|
Ders Ön Koşulu |
Yok |
AMAÇ VE İÇERİK |
Amaç: |
At the end of this course, students will be able to recognize the most important arguments of religion, metaphysics, epistemology and morality and analyze, evaluate and criticize these arguments with logical reasoning. |
İçerik: |
Contents of the course include the examination of most effective arguments on the philosophy of religion in Western philosophy (St. Aquinas, Pascal, Plato and Nietzsche); metaphysics (Parmenides, Plato, Berkeley, Epicurus, Sartre); epistemology (Descartes, Gettier, Hume) and moral philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Kant and Mill). |
DERSİN ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARI (Öğrenciler, bu dersi başarı ile tamamladıklarında aşağıda belirtilen bilgi, beceri ve/veya yetkinlikleri gösterirler.) |
Recognize the most important arguments of Western philosophy about religion, metaphysics, epistemology and moral philosophy. |
Question whether these arguments can be derived from the results and precessors or not. |
Differentiate valid, coherent and robust reasoning from invalid, inconsistent and inaccurate reasoning. |
Interpret the most important arguments of western philosophy. |
Interpret moral dilemmas based on philosophical thought experiments and hypothesis. |
Discuss with each other in order to better predict and avoid counter-arguments. |
HAFTALIK DERS KONULARI VE ÖNGÖRÜLEN HAZIRLIK ÇALIŞMALARI |
Hafta |
Ön Hazırlık |
Konular |
Yöntem |
1 |
Reading |
Discussion on the nature of philosophical arguments |
Lecture, discussion |
2 |
Reading |
Philosophy of Religion: Five Evidences of St. Aquinas |
Lecture, discussion |
3 |
Reading |
Argument of Word, Onthological argument |
Lecture, discussion |
4 |
Reading |
Pascal's gambling, James' desire to believe |
Lecture, discussion |
5 |
Reading |
Problem of evil, Defense of free will |
Lecture, discussion |
6 |
Reading |
Euthyphron dilemma, Nietzsche’s argument of "God is Dead" |
Lecture, discussion |
7 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture, discussion |
8 |
- |
MID-TERM EXAM |
- |
9 |
Reading |
Metaphysics: Parmenides' rejection of change, Platon's argument of ideas |
Lecture, discussion |
10 |
Reading |
Berkeley's idealism, Epicurus' argument on death, Sartre's argument on freedom |
Lecture, discussion |
11 |
Reading |
Epistemology: Descartes's Cogito argument, Gettier problem, Hume's problem of reasoning |
Lecture, discussion |
12 |
Reading |
Philosophy of ethics: Platon's State, Aristoteles' argument on function |
Lecture, discussion |
13 |
Reading |
Kant's categorical command |
Lecture, discussion |
14 |
Reading |
Kant's categorical command |
Lecture, discussion |
15 |
Reading |
Mill and utilitarianism |
Lecture, discussion |
16 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
17 |
- |
FINAL EXAM |
- |
KAYNAKLAR |
Bruce, M. & Barbone, S. (2017). Batı Felsefesindeki 100 Temel Mesele. Çeviri: Mustafa Topal, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. |
Platon (2018). Devlet. Çeviri: M. Ali Cimcoz, Sabahattin Eyüboğlu. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. |
Nietzsche, F. (2010). Ahlakın Soy Kütüğü Üzerine. Çeviri: Turan Erdem. İstanbul: Arya Yayıncılık. |
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Essex: Pearson. |
Dennet, D. (2013). Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: Norton. |
ÖLÇME VE DEĞERLENDİRME |
Yarıyıl İçi Yapılan Çalışmaların Ölçme ve Değerlendirmesi |
Etkinlik Sayısı |
Katkı Yüzdesi |
Açıklama |
(0) Etkisiz |
(1) En Düşük |
(2) Düşük |
(3) Orta |
(4) İyi |
(5) Çok İyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
DERSİN PROGRAM ÖĞRENME ÇIKTILARINA KATKISI
KNOWLEDGE |
Theoretical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Define the theories, concepts and principles of the basic and sub-fields of business.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Explain business functions and processes based on current scientific sources.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
KNOWLEDGE |
Factual |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Relate internationally valid business cases with the theories and concepts of other social sciences.
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
SKILLS |
Cognitive |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Explain the current events and facts in his / her field analytically and systematically based on advanced knowledge and skills he / she has.
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
SKILLS |
Practical |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Use the theoretical and factual knowledge in business for occupational practices.
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
Solve individual and organizational problems in business life.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
Use computer programs (SPSS, R, Excel, Stata) efficiently against the complex business problems.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Plan research and work using knowledge and skills gained in the field of business.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
Organize the activities for organizational goals and purposes independently.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Learning to Learn |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Criticize advanced knowledge and skills in the field with a critical approach.
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
2 |
Develop the existing knowledge and skills with a critical point of view under the impact of scientific, technological and current developments.
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Communication & Social |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Express his/her knowledge, thoughts and solutions on business to related stakeholders in written and verbal ways.
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
Use the information and communication technology software and equipment required for business.
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
OCCUPATIONAL |
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|
Program Yeterlilikleri/Çıktıları |
Katkı Düzeyi |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
Apply the social, scientific, cultural and ethical values at the stages of collection of data, their implementation, interpretation and announcement of results in the field of business.
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
2 |
Relate the concepts of social rights, occupational safety, employee health, quality management and sustainability with the cases in business life.
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
DERSİN İŞ YÜKÜ VE AKTS KREDİSİ |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri İş Yükü |
Öğrenme-Öğretme Etkinlikleri |
Etkinlik(hafta sayısı) |
Süresi(saat sayısı) |
Toplam İş Yükü |
Lecture & In-Class Activities |
14 |
3 |
42 |
Preliminary & Further Study |
13 |
1 |
13 |
Land Surveying |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Group Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Laboratory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reading |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Assignment (Homework) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Project Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Seminar |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Internship |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Technical Visit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Web Based Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Implementation/Application/Practice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Practice at a workplace |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Occupational Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Social Activity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Thesis Work |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Field Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Report Writing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Final Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Final Exam |
7 |
4 |
28 |
Mid-Term Exam |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Preparation for the Short Exam |
0 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
41 |
0 |
100 |
|
Genel Toplam |
100 |
|
|
Toplam İş Yükü / 25.5 |
3,9 |
|
|
Dersin AKTS(ECTS) Kredisi |
4,0 |
|