| Code | Name of the Course Unit | Semester | In-Class Hours (T+P) | Credit | ECTS Credit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSM256 | GIDA TASARIMI VE DUYUSAL ANALİZ | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
GENERAL INFORMATION |
|
|---|---|
| Language of Instruction : | Turkish |
| Level of the Course Unit : | BACHELOR'S DEGREE, TYY: + 6.Level, EQF-LLL: 6.Level, QF-EHEA: First Cycle |
| Type of the Course : | Compulsory |
| Mode of Delivery of the Course Unit | - |
| Coordinator of the Course Unit | Assist.Prof. NEVRUZ BERNA TATLISU |
| Instructor(s) of the Course Unit | |
| Course Prerequisite | No |
OBJECTIVES AND CONTENTS |
|
|---|---|
| Objectives of the Course Unit: | The main objective of the course is to provide students with knowledge about food formulations and the place, importance, and application of sensory analysis within the science of gastronomy. |
| Contents of the Course Unit: | This course will cover the following topics: definitions of food formulations and sensory analysis, their importance and use in gastronomy, quality characteristics in foods and food formulations, principles of sensory analysis and analysis panel design, factors affecting sensory analysis panel design, scales used and flavor profile creation, food formulations and consumer preferences, special foods and their formulations, and will include practical examples. |
KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE COURSE UNIT (On successful completion of this course unit, students/learners will or will be able to) |
|---|
| The student can define the concepts of food design and sensory analysis within the framework of gastronomy. |
| The student can explain the relationship between quality characteristics and formulation in foods. |
| The student can evaluate the basic principles of sensory analysis and its applications in gastronomy. |
| The student can explain sensory analysis panel design and the factors influencing this design. |
| The student can interpret the basic scales used in sensory analysis and the process of creating a flavor profile. |
| The student can analyze the relationship between food formulations and consumer preferences. |
| The student can discuss examples of sensory analysis and food design in the field of gastronomy from a scientific perspective. |
WEEKLY COURSE CONTENTS AND STUDY MATERIALS FOR PRELIMINARY & FURTHER STUDY |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Preparatory | Topics(Subjects) | Method |
| 1 | Review of fundamental concepts and relevant literature. | Course content and assessment system, food design and sensory analysis concepts | Lecture, Question-Answer, Discussion |
| 2 | Investigation of physical and chemical parameters determining sensory perception. | Importance and use of food design and sensory analysis concepts from the perspective of gastronomy | Lecture, Case Study |
| 3 | Investigation of physical and chemical parameters determining food quality. | Fundamentals of sensory perception | Lecture, Presentation with Visual Material Support |
| 4 | Readings on the five senses and perception mechanisms. | Quality characteristics and formulations in foods | Lecture, Simple In-Class Perception Tests (Smell/Taste Matching) |
| 5 | Research on panelist selection criteria and laboratory conditions. | Principles of sensory analysis | Lecture, Panel Room Simulation and Design Example |
| 6 | Examination of hedonic scales and cobweb diagrams. | Sensory analysis panel design and influencing factors | Lecture, Applied Flavor Profiling Exercise |
| 7 | Reading articles on market research and consumer behavior. | Scales used in sensory analysis | Lecture, Group Discussion |
| 8 | Students preparing presentations on the reformulation of a product of their choice. | Difference, acceptance and consumer preference tests | Lecture, Comparative Product Analysis |
| 9 | Students preparing presentations on the reformulation of a product of their choice. | Descriptive analysis and statistical evaluation & General review | Applied Demonstration, Tasting Panel, Data Collection |
| 10 | - | MID-TERM EXAM | - |
| 11 | Students preparing presentations on the reformulation of a product of their choice. | Food design techniques in gastronomy, specialty foods and food formulations, recipe development | Applied Demonstration, Texture Profile Analysis, Tasting |
| 12 | Students preparing presentations on the reformulation of a product of their choice. | Sensory analysis and food formulation sample application from the perspective of gastronomy - I | Applied Demonstration, Hedonic Test Application |
| 13 | Students preparing presentations on the reformulation of a product of their choice. | Sensory analysis and food formulation sample application from the perspective of gastronomy - II | Applied Demonstration, Error Detection Exercise, Data Interpretation |
| 14 | Students preparing presentations on the reformulation of a product of their choice. | Evaluation of sensory analysis results | Student Presentations, Peer Review, Discussion |
| 15 | General review | Evaluation of sensory analysis results and General review | General review |
| 16 | - | FINAL EXAM | - |
| 17 | - | FINAL EXAM | - |
SOURCE MATERIALS & RECOMMENDED READING |
|---|
| Bilişli, A. (2012). Gıda teknolojisi. Sidaş. |
| Durlu Özkaya, F. (Ed.). (2024). Gastronomide ürün geliştirme ve duyusal analiz. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. |
ASSESSMENT |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment & Grading of In-Term Activities | Number of Activities | Degree of Contribution (%) | Description | Examination Method |
| Mid-Term Exam | 1 | 30 | Optical (Test) Exam | |
| Practice | 1 | 20 | ||
| Final Exam | 1 | 50 | Optical (Test) Exam | |
| TOTAL | 3 | 100 | ||
| Level of Contribution | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
KNOWLEDGE |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theoretical |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can define basic concepts about gastronomy.
|
3 | |||||
| 2 |
Can interpret basic concepts, study areas and approaches related to the field.
|
3 | |||||
KNOWLEDGE |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factual |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can relate the information and facts about the field to the social sciences such as Law, Sociology, Philosophy and Economy.
|
2 | |||||
| 2 |
Can compare national and international cuisines in terms of similarities and differences.
|
2 | |||||
SKILLS |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can analyze the eating and drinking art, the related systems and structures.
|
4 | |||||
| 2 |
Can prepare technical infrastructure and contents of the culinary activies.
|
2 | |||||
SKILLS |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practical |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can apply theoretical knowledge about food science into the field of gastronomy.
|
3 | |||||
| 2 |
Can collaborate with the shareholders to present new challenging ideas and products for the market.
|
2 | |||||
| 3 |
Can integrate basic cooking techniques and product preparation principles into today's technology.
|
2 | |||||
| 4 |
Can plan the work schedule and workflow in food and beverage enterprises.
|
2 | |||||
OCCUPATIONAL |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomy & Responsibility |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can calculate costing in the food and beverage facilities.
|
3 | |||||
| 2 |
Can carry out management theories, recruitment and evaluation processes effectively in the food and beverage business.
|
2 | |||||
| 3 |
Can organize national and international competitions and fairs.
|
1 | |||||
OCCUPATIONAL |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Learning to Learn |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can examine developments, changes and innovations in the field by acceptng lifelong learning as a principle.
|
4 | |||||
| 2 |
Can find planning, executioning and editing mistakes systematicly related to his field.
|
3 | |||||
OCCUPATIONAL |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Communication & Social |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can express his/her ideas verbally and orally by using presentation and communication techniques.
|
3 | |||||
| 2 |
Can organize all gastronomy-related activities.
|
1 | |||||
OCCUPATIONAL |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupational and/or Vocational |
|||||||
| Programme Learning Outcomes | Level of Contribution | ||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 |
Can interpret ethical values and legal regulations according to the codexes.
|
1 | |||||
| 2 |
Can design communial and social pojects using historical, cultural and geographical values.
|
1 | |||||
| 3 |
Can perform scientific researche and study using knowledge and skills related to his field.
|
2 | |||||
WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE UNIT |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
Workload for Learning & Teaching Activities |
|||
| Type of the Learning Activites | Learning Activities (# of week) | Duration (hours, h) | Workload (h) |
| Lecture & In-Class Activities | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Preliminary & Further Study | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Land Surveying | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Group Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reading | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assignment (Homework) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Internship | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Technical Visit | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Web Based Learning | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Implementation/Application/Practice | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| Practice at a workplace | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Occupational Activity | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Social Activity | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thesis Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Field Study | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Report Writing | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Preparation for the Final Exam | 7 | 3 | 21 |
| Mid-Term Exam | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Preparation for the Mid-Term Exam | 7 | 3 | 21 |
| Short Exam | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preparation for the Short Exam | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 50 | 0 | 152 |
| Total Workload of the Course Unit | 152 | ||
| Workload (h) / 25.5 | 6 | ||
| ECTS Credits allocated for the Course Unit | 6,0 |